Kierkegaard, for his part, was able to "live" in the absurd for part of his life. This allowed him to dive into the "spiritual adventure" of his "beloved scandals.". To a degree, Kierkegaard mirrors the later example that Camus uses of the "absurd man"—Don Juan, a serial seducer. The myth of Sisyphus is being discussed from an objective third-party viewpoint, and the speaker is not addressing anyone in particular by name. The admiration and optimism that are being communicated by the speaker are open-ended and can be directed toward anyone who is confronted with challenges that appear to be insurmountable. 3. Sisyphus; The Myth" is independent from its predecessors time-travel takes in Korean film and TV by focusing upon the actual concept of time travel, rather than choosing the wrinkle-in-time concept, in which characters from two different timelines coexist, come up time and again. The Myth of Sisyphus, as a defense of that view, is an essay about a moral choice represented by the image of ceaseless physical toil. It teaches the power and the morality of exercising one's free will to overcome a physical challenge. And though Camus' argument applies to any obstacles encountered in the course of our lives, it is the The Myth of Sisyphus is a good introduction to Camus. It is definitely a tedious read at times because Camus relies a lot on examples or references (like you said) to present his positions. It is, however, a philosophy book, so you don't necessarily have to read it like a novel. Feel free to skip pages if you feel "too bored" or go back pages The fundamental subject of "The Myth of Sisyphus" is this: it is legitimate and necessary to wonder whether life has a meaning; therefore it is legitimate to meet the problem of suicide face to face. The answer, underlying and appearing through the paradoxes which cover it, is this: even if one does not believe in God, suicide is not .

what is the myth of sisyphus